Subscribe to JFA

  • Sign up for JFA Email
    Email:

Search JFActivist

  • Google

    WWW
    jfactivist.typepad.com

« NY: State Claims that Institution's $1.7 Million per Client per Year Rate is too Low | Main | States Consider Opting Out of Medicaid Altogether »

November 13, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54ed3f13788330133f5d363eb970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference IL: Families Fight To Care For Disabled Kids At Home:

Comments

Shannessy Mitchell

First, to the law makers and politicians in the state of Illinois, are you serious? Where are you when your constituents need you? If there has ever been a cause for you to validate, the welfare and quality of life for a young woman, should be near the very top of your priority list. To the state of Illinois, despite the state’s financial crunch, it is your responsibility and duty to ensure that your residents are provided with every opportunity that federal and state laws require. That includes the rights bestowed by the American with Disabilities Act. In this time and era when humanity is struggling to regain a foot hold on the meaning of a quality of life, it is cases like Olivia Welter, that exemplify the nature of human passion.

Csaba S. Hutoczki

The dilemma stems from the fundamentally flawed law that when a disabled person like Olivia turns 21, as an adult, she is now suddenly considered eligible for a narrowed spectrum of services. When will Olivia be able to enjoy all or just one of the benefits of what becoming 21 means to millions of temporarily able-bodied young adults? When it comes to the problem of reducing benefits for persons like Olivia just because they turn 21, the very terminology of “adulthood” and its meaning ought to be reevaluated in the precise context that applies.

Besides the biological and physiological definitions of adulthood, there is also a very important and inseparable legal aspect here. According to one of the many similar explanations, adult age is the age “at which a person is liable for their own actions, such as contractual obligations or liability for negligence. In general, a parental duty of support to a child ceases when the child reaches the age of majority.”
‘Liable for their own actions….and …support to a child ceases,’ hmmm...Olivia cannot speak and machines help her breathe, eat, and even cough to be able to clear her lungs. What are the odds that those who made the laws and regulations to decrease the availability of care just because of that magic number 21, really considered cases like Olivia’s?

I hope at least the courts will understand the proper context and use discretion in deciding that entitlements for Olivia or others in a similar situation shall not diminish just because reaching a certain age when their condition and needs remain the same.

J. Ito-Carver

Providing a superior quality of life for individuals who are unable to care for themselves should take priority over the cost of care. We live in a civilized society where every person is a person of value and with the right to live a dignified life. Gone are the days of casting aside individuals with disabilities and forcing them to live in institutions. We should support ways to deliver the best possible care to individuals with disabilities, which in most cases, is having the choice of home based care where their quality of life will be much better. We need to advocate for changes to Medicaid that will provide home health care or a choice of caregiver and care location. People should not be pressured into living in an institutional setting. We need to support and encourage our Congress members to support the Community Choice Act to ensure that people with disabilities will have a choice because, ultimately, there is no place like home.

Magalita Te'o

This is just terrible!
I just read the full story and listened to the recording of the story.
Just sad.
First of all, I am thankful for President Ronald Reagan! How awesome of what he had implemented within the medicaid program to allow individuals with disablilities to be taken care of in their homes.
There definitely needs to be a low cost option and care available from medicaid for individuals who are consider to be an adult. and in this case, would be someone that is 21 and older.
After lisening to the recording and reading the title, " States are caught between helping families and dealing with medicaid costs"..I mean this is all about MONEY! It just makes me a little mad thinking about that!!!
and then the fact that some nursing homes refuse to take in Olivia..how terrible!
I didn't know there were guidelines that had to be met before a person could be accepted in a nursing home.
I support the change in medicaid that will give individals with disabilities quality care and attention that is needed!

The comments to this entry are closed.