Press Release from Senator Mikulski (11/17/09):
SENATOR MIKULSKI
INTRODUCES BILL TO STRIKE TERMS “MENTAL RETARDATION” AND “MENTALLY RETARDED”
FROM FEDERAL LAWBOOKS
“Rosa’s
Law” honors young girl whose brother said, “… what you call people is how you
treat them.”
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S.
Senator Barbara A. Mikulski today introduced “Rosa’s Law,” a bill that will
eliminate the terms “mental retardation” and “mentally retarded” from the
federal law books. U.S. Senator Michael B. Enzi (R-Wyo.), Ranking Member
of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, is the Republican
sponsor of the bill.
Under Rosa’s Law,
those terms would be replaced with “intellectual disability” and “individual
with an intellectual disability” in federal education, health and labor law.
The bill does not expand or diminish services, rights or educational
opportunities. It simply makes the federal law language consistent with that
used by the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization and the
President of the United States, through his Committee on Individuals with
Intellectual Disabilities.
Rosa’s Law
replicates a law recently adopted in Maryland. Senator Mikulski first heard
about the state law from Rosa’s mother during a roundtable discussion about
special education held in Edgewater, Maryland. Due to requirements in the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), each student who receives
special education services at public schools has an individualized education
program (IEP) that describes the student’s disability and the special education
and services that child will receive. Rosa has an intellectual disability –
Downs Syndrome – and so was designated as a student with “mental retardation”
in her IEP, giving way to people at the school referring to Rosa as retarded.
Senator Mikulski promised Rosa’s mother that if the bill became law in
Maryland, she would take it to the floor of the United States Senate.
“This bill is driven by a
passion for social justice and compassion for the human condition,” said
Senator Mikulski, a senior member of the HELP Committee. “We’ve done a lot to
come out of the dark ages of institutionalization and exclusion when it comes
to people with intellectual disabilities. I urge my colleagues to join me to
take a step further. The disability community deserves it. Rosa deserves it.”
“Mental retardation” and “mentally retarded” are terms commonly used in federal laws, including the Individual With Disabilities Education Act, the Higher Education Act, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, also known as No Child Left Behind, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
“We know now that words have meaning, sometimes far beyond what we intend,” added Senator Enzi. “Therefore, we must be very careful about the way we describe the people we see every day, including those with disabilities, or those who are undergoing treatment for a variety of health issues. Unfortunately, the federal government has not dropped this term from our laws and it still appears in the regulations and statutes that come before our legislative bodies and our courts. I am pleased to have this opportunity to join my colleague from Maryland, Senator Mikulski, in introducing Rosa’s law. I would like to thank her for her leadership and her commitment on this issue. Simply put, this legislation will make an important change in the words we use to refer to those with intellectual disabilities. It is a much needed change in the law that is fully deserving of our support.”
When Rosa’s Law was being considered by the Maryland General Assembly, Rosa’s 13-year-old brother, Nick, successfully testified on her behalf for a substitution of mentally retarded with intellectual disability. He explained, “Some people say they are just words, and it’s not going to make a difference if we just change the words. Some say we shouldn’t worry about the words, just the way we treat people. But when you think about it, what you call people is how you treat them! If we change the words, maybe it’ll be the start of a new attitude towards people with intellectual disabilities. They deserve it.”
“Senator Mikulski’s bill is a most welcome and necessary step in ending the pervasive discrimination against the 7 million people living with intellectual disabilities in this country,” stated Peter V. Berns, the Chief Executive Officer of The Arc of the U.S. “With federal adoption of the term ‘intellectual disability’ perhaps our society and others will begin to understand the legitimacy of the condition and treat those living with it in a more respectful fashion.”
The Arc is the world’s largest community based organization of and for people
with intellectual and developmental disabilities. It provides an array of
services and support for families and individuals and includes over 140,000
members affiliated through more than 780 state and local chapters across
the nation. The Arc is devoted to promoting and improving supports and services
for all people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Rosa’s Law has garnered support from six
additional cosponsors from both sides of the aisle, Senator Sherrod Brown
(D-Ohio), Senator Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.), Senator Lamar
Alexander (R- Tenn.), Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Senator Richard Burr
(R-N.C.), Senator Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa),
and Senator John Thune (R-S.D.), as well as more than 30 national
organizations to date: http://mikulski.senate.gov/_pdfs/Press/Organizations.pdf.
A copy of the Dear Colleague letter
circulated by Senators Mikulski and Enzi is available here: http://mikulski.senate.gov/_pdfs/Press/RosasLawDearColleageLetter.pdf.
Senator Mikulski’s full floor statement is here: http://mikulski.senate.gov/Newsroom/PressReleases/record.cfm?id=319975.
From the Disability Policy Collaboration (11/17/09):
|
The
Disability Policy Collaboration Applauds the
|
|
“This
bill is very important for people with intellectual disabilities who
understand that language plays a crucial role in how they are perceived and
treated in society and are actively advocating for terminology changes in
federal and state laws. ‘Retard,’ ‘retarded’ and ‘retardation,’
once accepted medical terms, are now often used to demean and insult people,”
stated Peter V. Berns, Chief Executive Officer of The Arc. “The Arc
believes that changing how we talk about people with disabilities is a
critical step in promoting and protecting their basic civil and human
rights.” According
to Senator
Mikulski’s statement to the U.S. Senate upon introduction of the bill is
available at: http://mikulski.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=319975&. While
the DPC supports the U.S. Senate’s introduction of |
applaud the senate...
please read this article and add it to your toolbox of people first language, correct/current usage of how we refer to individuals with disabilities.
just take a minute to think about it. its easy to do.
thanks.
Posted by: Lisa | November 18, 2009 at 06:38 PM
That's sad but bad at the same time! I wouldn't want to not like the name of autistic if society uses it inaccurately! I at least wouldn't go against the name of what I have for that! If the word is used in the accurate way and it is what it is in that way it's just like saying autistic or someone is an aspie. Society misuses the word of retardation and inaccurizes it so everyone's so glad to give in to it and change it. That's too bad. I have some friends """with intelectual disabilities""" (at least it doesn't sound as bad as mentally challenged!) and they are amazing. I would say they have retardation in a complimentery way of course like if I say that I also have a friend who has Asperger's Syndrome or something. I'm glad I wasn't involved. Eewwwey!
I'm glad to say that I like what I have.
-mad BPASD Furball
Posted by: Furball | November 19, 2009 at 02:12 AM
I find it interesting that the ARC was mentioned as a supporter of this, however completely fails to acknowledge that "Retarded" is in THEIR OWN NAME! When will that be changed?
Posted by: Brent | November 19, 2009 at 03:43 PM
Sadly, there will be thousands and thousands AND THOUSANDS of dollars spent to replace one label with another, which will in time become just as distasteful as the first. That money could be used much better to actually do some concrete good for people with disabilities...which of course is yet another label that replaced crips, gimps, and similar terms. *Sigh*.
Honestly, I prefer the keychain I found for one of my disability clients.It says," You laugh because I'm different. I laugh because you're ugly." Short, simple,straight to the point and not a single label.
Posted by: Dee Wheat | November 20, 2009 at 08:25 PM
Orwellian Newspeak!
Posted by: D.C. Russell | November 22, 2009 at 05:57 PM
Labels have become outdated throughout history and this is an opportunity to continue changing them to reflect our growing respect for people with disabilities. There is no substitute for the respect that comes with person-first language. Hooray for the attention this is calling to the issue!
Posted by: Stephanie | November 29, 2009 at 01:26 AM
It comes a time when all bad things must end, and this is the time to end retard, retardation, mentally challenged and mentally retarded. I say why not, just call all people by their God given names and leave out the medical conditions.Or, we can solicitate to pass a law that will allow people to call each other as they appear to us, such as, round face, big ears, fat lips and see how you will like people calling you names. This comment is submitted by Selma Disabilies Advocacy Program, 701 Lauderdale Street, Selma, AL 36702, (334) 875-6001.
Posted by: Selma Disabilities Advocacy Program | January 14, 2010 at 01:49 AM